1:34 Confirmed
“We take a box and pump out the air. What's left is a vacuum.”
All episodes
Episode
Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing?
Try to imagine nothing. It turns out to be surprisingly hard. We make a box as empty as we possibly can and look at what physics still finds inside. Then we look at the question itself and at five answers from philosophy, physics, and faith. None of them is proven.
Sources
40 claims, 67 sources. Research as of October 18, 2026.
How we check
This page lists every factual claim from the video, with the sources it rests on. Every claim in the video is backed by these sources. We saved each page when we read it. The archived copies on the Internet Archive show what the page said at that time, even if it changes later.
Not everything is equally well backed. We say so openly in the video, and here it's marked on every claim:
- Confirmed
- At least two independent, reputable sources say the same thing.
Sources marked background are fan sites or blogs. They add context, but we don't count them as evidence.
Found a mistake? Tell us in the comments under the video or at hi@kadeemy.com. We pin corrections to the top there.
Intro 0:00Imagining nothing
This part has no new factual claims.
Chapter 1 1:28Empty isn't nothing
1:40 Confirmed
“Still, the box isn't completely empty. Heat radiates in through the walls.”
1:45 Confirmed
“And from space, there's even light from the early universe: the cosmic microwave background.”
“Even then, according to quantum physics, something remains: fields. They fill all of space. And they never come completely to rest. Even in the state with the lowest possible energy, they jitter a little.”
2:18 Confirmed
“… just a few thousandths of a millimeter apart …”
2:21 Confirmed also at 2:26, 2:31
“Between them, there's so little room that only certain fluctuations fit in.”
2:33 Confirmed
“So there's more pushing from outside than from inside, and the plates get pushed toward each other.”
2:38 Confirmed
“The physicist Hendrik Casimir predicted this in 1948.”
2:44 Confirmed
“In 1997, this force was clearly measured.”
Context: In 1997 Lamoreaux measured between a curved lens (sphere) and a flat plate, not between two parallel plates: he did not manage to keep plates parallel enough (S28). The first measurement with two parallel plates was published by Bressi and colleagues in 2002 (S107). It is the same force; the picture shows Casimir's prediction with plates, which is why the label names the 1997 setup (adversarial review 2026-10-06 A01).
- Lamoreaux, Demonstration of the Casimir Force in the 0.6 to 6 µm Range (Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 5, 1997)
- The Casimir effect: a force from nothing (Astrid Lambrecht, Physics World 2002)
- Lamoreaux 1997, PRL 78, 5 (full-text copy, MIT)
- Bressi, Carugno, Onofrio, Ruoso, Measurement of the Casimir Force between Parallel Metallic Surfaces (Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 041804, 2002)
“… you can also calculate it without any jittering vacuum at all.”
2:59 Confirmed
“According to the older theory, two of its energy levels should be exactly equal. But they're not. They're off by a tiny bit. Measuring that even earned a Nobel Prize.”
Context: Willis Lamb and Robert Retherford did the measurement together (S83); the 1955 Nobel Prize went to Lamb (shared with Polykarp Kusch for a different discovery). The two levels are called 2S½ and 2P½, to be exact; the picture names both experimenters and this notation, the voiceover stays with Lamb.
3:09 Confirmed
“And the usual explanation for the difference is, once again, the jittering vacuum.”
3:17 Confirmed
“So the emptiest thing physics knows is not empty.”
3:33 Confirmed
“But the Big Bang theory describes something else. It tells how the universe developed from a very hot, dense state, about thirteen point eight billion years ago. Where that state came from, it doesn't say.”
3:52 Confirmed
“In 2012, the cosmologist Lawrence Krauss wrote a book called A Universe from Nothing.”
- David Albert, On the Origin of Everything (New York Times Book Review, 2012)
- Philosophy under attack: Lawrence Krauss and the new denialism (The Conversation)
- Lawrence Krauss On 'A Universe From Nothing' (NPR 2012)
- Has Physics Made Philosophy and Religion Obsolete? (interview with Lawrence Krauss, The Atlantic 2012)
“His idea: under the laws of quantum physics, empty space is unstable, so universes could arise on their own.”
“In a review, the philosopher David Albert wrote, roughly: even the emptiest vacuum is a particular arrangement of physical stuff.”
Chapter 2 4:40An old question
4:47 Confirmed
“In 1714, the polymath Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz wrote it down like this …”
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften (German: The Philosophical Writings), ed. C. I. Gerhardt, vol. 6 (Berlin 1885), full text (OCR of the Bavarian State Library scan)
- Pourquoi y a-t-il quelque chose plutôt que rien ? (French: Why is there something rather than nothing? Text excerpts, Université de Nantes)
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Britannica)
- Profil der Leibniz Universität Hannover (German: Profile of Leibniz University Hannover)
- Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (Leibniz-Gemeinschaft)
- Es war einmal ein Universalgelehrter (German: Once upon a time there was a polymath; DFG)
4:53 Confirmed
“Why is there something rather than nothing? And right away, he added why this is a question at all …”
- Pourquoi y a-t-il quelque chose plutôt que rien ? (French: Why is there something rather than nothing? Text excerpts, Université de Nantes)
- Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften (German: The Philosophical Writings), ed. C. I. Gerhardt, vol. 6 (Berlin 1885), full text (OCR of the Bavarian State Library scan)
- Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace, based on Reason (translated by Jonathan Bennett)
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (full text)
5:00 Confirmed
“… nothing is simpler and easier than something.”
- Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften (German: The Philosophical Writings), ed. C. I. Gerhardt, vol. 6 (Berlin 1885), full text (OCR of the Bavarian State Library scan)
- Pourquoi y a-t-il quelque chose plutôt que rien ? (French: Why is there something rather than nothing? Text excerpts, Université de Nantes)
- Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace, based on Reason (translated by Jonathan Bennett)
“But then X is already something, and you can ask again: So why is there X?”
Chapter 3 5:20Five answers
5:42 Confirmed
“Something exists necessarily, the way two plus two is necessarily four.”
5:47 Confirmed
“For Leibniz, that couldn't be the world itself, because the world could have been different.”
5:52 Confirmed
“He called this necessary something God.”
- Leibniz, Principles of Nature and Grace, based on Reason (translated by Jonathan Bennett)
- Leibniz, Die philosophischen Schriften (German: The Philosophical Writings), ed. C. I. Gerhardt, vol. 6 (Berlin 1885), full text (OCR of the Bavarian State Library scan)
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (full text)
5:55 Confirmed
“Many religious traditions answer in a similar way: with a creator who exists necessarily, unlike the world.”
6:03 Confirmed
“Philosophers call this the cosmological argument.”
6:06 Confirmed
“The objection: how do we know the world itself isn't that necessary something?”
6:16 Confirmed
“In a 1980 essay on matter and antimatter, the physicist Frank Wilczek, who later won the Nobel Prize, came up with the phrase: nothing is unstable.”
- The Cosmic Asymmetry between Matter and Antimatter (Scientific American, December 1980)
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (full text)
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (author's blog 2018)
- Frank Wilczek, Facts (Nobelpreis Physik 2004)
- Why there is something rather than nothing: The finite, infinite and eternal (arXiv 2012)
6:30 Confirmed
“The objection: something that is unstable is already something.”
“The physicist Max Tegmark thinks every mathematically conceivable world really exists.”
- Why Does the World Exist? (Rezension, Christian Science Monitor 2012)
- On the First Anthropic Argument in Astrobiology (arXiv)
- Max Tegmark, The Mathematical Universe (full text, arXiv)
- Is the Universe Made of Math? [Excerpt] (Max Tegmark, Scientific American 2014)
- Why there is something rather than nothing: The finite, infinite and eternal (arXiv 2012)
6:50 Confirmed
“The objection: critics consider this untestable.”
“In 1948, the philosopher Bertrand Russell debated the existence of God on the radio, and this exact question came up. His words: "I should say that the universe is just there, and that's all."”
- Russell, Why I Am Not a Christian (London 1957), including: The Existence of God. A Debate between Bertrand Russell and Father F. C. Copleston (full text, OCR)
- Cosmological Argument (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- Bertrand Russell (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
- A Debate on the Argument from Contingency (Russell, Copleston, BBC 1948) background
7:14 Confirmed
“The objection came from his opponent in the debate, a Jesuit priest: "Why something rather than nothing, that is the question."”
7:27 Confirmed
“It assumes that nothing is the normal case and something the surprise. But why, exactly?”
7:38 Confirmed
“There are infinitely many ways a world with something in it could look. But only one empty one. If you count that way, nothing is the least likely case of all.”
7:48 Confirmed
“Whether you're even allowed to count worlds like that, though, is disputed.”
Chapter 4 8:00No answer?
8:04 Confirmed
“Some philosophers say: to explain something means to trace it back to something else. But for the whole, there's nothing else left. If you start from nothing, you have no ingredients an explanation could follow from.”
8:20 Confirmed
“That's why the physicist Sean Carroll thinks it's quite possible that the question has no answer. Maybe the world is simply there, and the search for an ultimate reason leads nowhere.”
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (arXiv 2018)
- Sean Carroll, Why Is There Something, Rather Than Nothing? (author's blog 2018)
- Sean Carroll, A Universe from Nothing? (author's blog 2012, section "The end of explanations")
- Why Is There Something Rather Than Nothing? (Sean Carroll on Grünbaum, Discover 2007)
8:30 Confirmed
“Those who believe in a necessary reason see it differently. For Leibniz, that necessary something carries the reason for its existence within itself.”
8:43 Confirmed
“Ludwig Wittgenstein put it in one sentence: "Not how the world is, is the mystical, but that it is."”